Not exactly correct. I am not advocating that the current inhabitants be 
displaced in return to make room for the older. I am saying that the older 
inhabitants have the right to return to the land and live upon it according to 
their own laws... that current inhabitants don't have the right to bar them 
from lands.
Specifically, I am saying that Israelis have no right to bar the land from 
Palestinians, nor to impose their laws upon the Palestinians. Nor do 
"Americans" have the right to hold Amerindians on reservations or to impose 
American law upon them.

John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                                  Michael, I 
appreciate most of your writing...not all of it.
 Looks to me like a kind of racist (what I do not call racist!) imprint as 
"original", meaning "earlier" owners meaning "inhabitants" of a territory. All 
Europeans live on stolen property IN EUROPE, (not only in America), because 
ancestors stole land from earlier inhabitants all over human history and 
imposed always their rules on it - including upon the remnants of the earlier 
'owners' (at least those whom they did not kill). 
 I call it 'quasi racist', because it ackowledges 'ancestrial' right 
superseding the living people reality. I consider "humans" as the actual 
people, not the "heirs" of foggy and idolized ancient brutes. I try to think in 
terms of "WE are here, WE want to live and in this respect a community has the 
right to protect itself, no matter how scoudrelish the 'ancestors' acquired the 
land. 
 Ancestors lived in another time, other morals, other sins. If we go back, 
back, and back, we eternalize the blood-revenge in a war of racist philosophy 
about 'ancestrial heritage and damage'. 
 I will come back to more later
 John
   ----- Original Message ----- 
   From: michael haaheim 
   To: [email protected] 
   Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 6:09 AM
   Subject: Re: [PNEWS-L] No One Is Illegal
 
 To rephrase something... yes, the descendants of the original Amerindians 
should be given the right to reoccupy their ancestral lands, while living 
according to their laws. We are ALL OF US living on stolen lands. ALL who "own" 
lands in the US are in possession of STOLEN lands.  According to the traditions 
of the original rightful inhabitants, land was not subject to ownership. It is 
not wrong for us to live also upon these lands, it is wrong that we enforce our 
laws upon those who were here first, and had the rightful claim.
   Those of European descent have NO RIGHT to enforce territorial laws upon 
others in the US.
   It is not correct to say that there are no illegal aliens. Better to say 
that the US has no moral right to impose such laws condemning aliens as 
illegal. 
 
 John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                                  Hank,
    your 'attacking' style is losing logic. Ignorance? of course and I am aware 
of more and more what I don't know, the more I learn. 
    You did not answer my quetion: do the decendants of the Amerindians have 
the 'right' to recapture Manhattan? It is the relevant question regarding the 
illigal Mexican workers to 'survive' (and claim their heritage in this country) 
beacuase the territory was historically "Mexican property" (I could add: 
rightfully, or not: Mexico had a Habsburg emperor, Maximilian,  
    so Austria also could claim Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California?). 
Start tackling with history and the world is over. You get to 'travesties' of 
justice (your word).
    And I object to your tactical trick to invoke Nafta against me: I am no 
proponent of Nafta. Never was. 
    Similarly I object to plant opinions (even words) into my writing, 
    I wonder where and when did I express to equate survival with illegality? 
Did you read at all what I wrote? Or you just decided how to paraphrase 
somebodies well crafted different opinion?
    Such policy of yours is discrediting not only you, but also the 'causes' 
you represent.( "Does this guy have no rightful  arguments?") 
    
    I accept criticism if it is just and right. I fight back if I am attacked 
unjustly. And if you throw me out from your list 
    my wife will send  you a thankyou note for all those free hours I will be 
able to spend with her instead of reading PNEWS-L.
    John
    
    ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: adar 
      To: [email protected] 
      Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 7:35 PM
      Subject: Re: [PNEWS-L] No One Is Illegal
    
    The entire Southwestern U.S., was part of Mexico until the U.S. military 
      invaded that sovereign nation in 1846 to FORCE the Mexican government to 
      "sell" one-third of its territory for a paltry sum. IN essence, this was 
a 
      theft. There are no absolutes John and your contention that Mexicans in 
      what was and still should be their own territory are illegal is a 
travasty 
      of justice which obviously you support.
    
    As for Donnella even thinking that immigrants are taking something away 
      from her that is simply her lack of understanding what wealth these 
people 
      bring with them and how much she is actually being ripped off by the 
      ruling elites in her own country, not the Mexicans we have forced to come 
      here to survive. If it a shame she can't see this - but for you John, it 
      is simply ignorance that you equate their survival with illegality. What 
      should be illegal is NAFTA which has caused death and suffering and 
      capitalism for which it was meant to provide unjust enrichment to the 
      rich. Unjust enrichment is a crime which goes beyond tort law for the 
evil 
      inherent in it.
    
    Hank
    
    On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, John wrote:
    
    > Hank:
    
    > How long do you want to ride this ridiculous and fallse usage of words, 
      > to mix up for the not-so-attentive gullible reader the term "illegal 
      > alien" with "illegal human"? No human being is illegal, of course, all 
      > have been created by the same physiological bio- function of a male 
      > (sperm) and a female (egg), in utero or in vitro, which is Nature's 
      > LEGAL way of human proliferation. You ride this term for arguing 
against 
      > the NONLEGA entering to the US - the ILLEGAL penetration of our 
country. 
      > Watch this: *LEGAL PERSONS INFILTRATE ILLEGALLY* and no sophism of 
yours 
      > can change the meaning of this. So please, stop boring us with your 
      > false interpretation of an immigrational problem into a philosophical 
      > sophism! In the name of all, who understand the difference Jophn
    
    >  ----- Original Message -----
      >  From: adar
      >  To: [email protected]
      >  Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 12:59 AM
      >  Subject: [PNEWS-L] No One Is Illegal
      >
      >
      >
      >  I shall leave you with this thought which undoubtedly many of you will
      >  find disagreement but some of you who are true progressives and 
humanists
      >  and seek justice will agree with me. NO ONE IS ILLEGAL! If you can 
think
      >  long enough to cut through the right wing wailing you will see the
      >  legitimacy of opening the borders and declaring everyone welcome - 
just as
      >  you will demand of your government enforcement of their labor laws and 
the
      >  right for everyone to form unions - including undocumented workers.
      >
      >  Immigration has been shaped by racism its entire history and is
      >  manipulated by corporate America to ensure a plentiful supply of cheap
      >  labor while using the fear of immigration to divide and rule the 
American
      >  working-class while making war on unions. Meanwhile NAFTA - The North
      >  American Free Trade Agreement have devastated Mexico's small farmer 
class
      >  and forced them to look for work in the cities of the U.S., thanks to 
Bill
      >  Clinton.
      >
      >  BOTH Democratic and Republican administrations have passed more and 
more
      >  draconian laws against undocumented workers as they whip up false
      >  sentiment against people of color and exploit labor with their 
corporate
      >  monopolies. This is Amerikkka. Death to Capitalism and to their
      >  corporate proxy political parties. If the Democrats
      >  don't impeach Bush, impeach the Democrats.
      >
      >    "Borders serve only to divide people and
      >  reinforce the power of capital over all workers."
      >
      >    People before Profits!
      >
      >    Later,
      >
      >  Hank Roth
      >  http://pnews.org/
      >
      >
    
    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    
    
        
                          
 
 ---------------------------------
   Building a website is a piece of cake. 
   Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 Progressive News/Views (since 1982)
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
     
                       

       
---------------------------------
Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, 
when. 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to