Biology doesn't require that you know what came before the `theory' of the "Big Bang". It doesn't add to your fitness for reproduction to know this also surely with your enlarged neo-cortex you will arrive at a theory and it will be peer reviewed and considering the genie has only been out of the bottle on the recipe of your 46 chromosomes it may take another 5 or 10 years before you discover the exploding, expanding universe was preceded by other like events and our cosmos won.
The knowledge doesn't set you free so much as your brain is a curse that either makes you more fit to survive predators or it will contribute to your extinction. Hank P.S. Rob: This is just a theory (g) --- In [email protected], "rob_analog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Your a man of science? But the science of before is not defined by > science or even speculated with theories? > "The nothing must be a full, logical and true nothing." A > contradiction. As a scientist you must believe in before as something > not nothing. Nothing and infinite are mutually exclusive. > Give up! The big bang was the ultimate creation. In a millionth of a > second all the matter in the universe exploded into existence, > expanding away at a convient velocity to allow stars planets and > life. God is back! > R > > > --- In [email protected], "jaze_mcaskill" <jaze_mcaskill@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > In this cause/effect universe, its hard to avoid wondering where it > > all started. Currently there are two or three main thins you can > do > > with that. 1) Say some diety created everything. 2) Believe in > the > > Big Bang theory. 3) Something else. Well, because I trust science > > and I want to know what came before cause, I did a little > figuring. > > The only first "cause" I would allow this theory is nothing. At > the > > beginning of the universe there wasn't anything. Just nothing as > far > > as the non-existent eye could see. There was nothing everywhere. > > Nothing was limitless. > > Now I'm a man of science. I don't believe or buy into that > > God, religious, buddah or jesus stuff. I believe in math, logic, > > objects I can see and feel and most of science. So when I try to > > think of how the universe started and I want to ascertain an > ultimate > > before, I have to start with nothing. . Not one of those partial > nothing's that > > are so common in colloquial English. In order for this nothing to > > have a truth value of "true" on a logical truth table, it must be > > infinite to consume all elses. If Plato were imagining this > nothing > > with me it would be the form of nothing. He would agree that it > > would have to be infinite. By definition the form of nothing must > be > > infinite or you have a vacuum and something. > > Here there's a snag. In order for nothing to have a truth > > value of "true" it must be infinite to maintain its form. That > > leaves me with an infinite nothing. Infinity is the exact opposite > > of nothing. Thus I must find a balance and be left with something. > > If nothing and infinity combine to make something, what is > it? > > Where is it? How is it? Who is it? When is it? I figured why. > > I could make a guess as to where. In the middle. That makes > me > > think of torque. > > What kind of torque? "a force that produces or tends to > produce > > rotation"? Yeah, that one because the closer to the center you > get, > > the higher the amount of torque there is. > > So this pithy nothing spun and spun with the torque it had. > > Its is a fact that there is a constant amount of matter and energy > in > > the universe (with exception to it's beginning perhaps). Matter > may > > be transformed into energy as in the explosion of an atom bomb, but > > the universal constant governing the two will remain unchanged. My > > point is that matter and energy are interchangeable. > > Nothing. Infinity. Torque. . . and the faster the spin the > > more torque. The more torque, the faster the spin. Until > eventually > > there was enogh energy (Nm) to create a materialistic explosion > known > > as the Big Bang. > > > > --Jaze > > >
