Hi, I did a new upload (with new logs to analyze): https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pocl
On 09/10/2014 17:45, Pekka Jääskeläinen wrote: > 9.10.2014 17:45, Vincent Danjean kirjoitti: >> 1) Debian bugs >> Would you agree that I subscribe the ML itself (ie >> [email protected] ) to the BTS so that all Debian bug >> reports >> will be sent to the ML ? >> Of course, if any bugs are only related to the packaging, I will handle >> them. But I suspect that most bugs will be for upstream and I would >> probably be more efficient that the ML itself receive directly the mail. > > Please use the pocl-commits-list instead. Let's try to keep this list > for discussions only. Bugs reports are mails written by human. So it would be more logical to send them to pocl-devel. That said, people interested into being notified about bug reports can subscribe individually to the Debian BTS for the pocl package. So these subscribes with ML are not mandatory at all >> 2) the BTS also offer the possibility to receive mail about build for >> each Debian architecture. Would it be interested that the ML is also >> subscribed to these mails ? > > Same here. Here, I agree that pocl-commits-list seems more pertinent. >> 3) pocl provides and install utlist.h. It is already packaged in Debian >> in uthash-dev (see #764571) [...] > It should not be required. Removed from the binary packages >> 4) #764561 and #764563 show that there is problem on most >> architectures. > ... >> I will do an upload this evening, at least to close #764571. >> I will put LLV_HOST_CPU for amd64, armhf and any other you >> suggest me. And I will see later for the reminding architectures. [...] I've done a first round-trip with your suggestions (many thanks). At the start of the build, I run "/usr/lib/llvm-3.5/bin/llc -mattr=help" so I will soon do another round with some fixes. I've three questions: * should I ignore the results of the testsuite? (but on amd64 probably) ie, if it compiles totally, should I generated the binary package even if the testsuite does not totally pass? * about i386, there are only a few tests that fail. Can they be fixed? Should they be ignored? Now, testsuite.log and all files under testsuite.dir are dumped into the log, so you can look at them if you wish. * about the architecture not recognized (for arm in particular) within the configure script, do you have a patch for me to apply? Regards Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho _______________________________________________ pocl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pocl-devel
