Thanks.  I thought this was the situation, but
I wanted to check.

Nice work on the werkzeug documentation.
It doesn't seem complete to me but I think it
gives me a pretty good idea how to read the source
to get the full picture.

One complaint: I personally don't find the
tutorial easy to follow because of the external
dependancy on sqlAlchemy.  This is a particularly
sticky issue with me because I find all OR
mappers irritating because I know I could
understand everything if I could just see the
actual SQL.  Suggestion: Why not factor out
the data access layer into a module that you
take as "given" and leave just the werkzeug
stuff exposed in the tutorial.  I would even
advocate removing the template dependancy.
Otherwise you almost have to read two other
tutorials in preparation for the werkzeug tutorial.

Thanks!

  -- Aaron Watters

On May 1, 5:58 am, Armin Ronacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Aaron Watters wrote:
> > If this makes any sense, what do you think?  And have
> > you implemented it?  Could it be added easily to
> > one of the pocoo libs if not?
>
> Our only library that deals with the technologies mentioned is werkzeug
> and that's just a toolkit to create web applications but doesn't enforce
> any direction.  If you want to do something like that I would suggest you
> create a microframework on top of Werkzeug.
>
> Regards,
> Armin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pocoo-libs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pocoo-libs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to