Hi, Eric wrote: > Perhaps the new jinja2 behavior can be an optional one. Either via > some environment setting or declaratively via the include statement. I've noted it down for a possible feature of 2.1, but I requires some more thinking about it.
Regards, Armin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pocoo-libs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pocoo-libs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
