Thanks, I'll take a look at the patch. But despite knowing the internals of the sorting mechanism, what is the sort order intended to be (regardless of the actual implementaion) ?
I'll surely have a ton of questions once I start understanding it :) -- Ronan On 26 oct, 19:08, Armin Ronacher <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/26/10 5:15 PM, rdunklau wrote:> I didn't find anything related to it on > the bugtracker, or elsewhere, > > and would like to know wether it is planned to be fixed ? Should I > > file a ticket for it ? > > That should definitively be fixed along with a whole bunch of > shortcomings in the routing system. Feel free to open one or more > tickets for this :) > > > Moreover, could someone provide me with resources on how the rule > > precedence works ? I'll be glad to try to fix it myself, but I can't > > figure out how this whole match_compare method works. > > At that point, few people know and not even I claim full understanding > of the mechanics. The main problem is that changing stuff there tends > to break peoples rules so extra care has to be taken. > > I got a patch by a guy named "hector" a while ago which was not yet > introduced but could be the start of a cleanup for the Werkzeug routing. > I attached that patch for the reference. > > In case you are interested in helping out there, ask me on #pocoo for a > detailed discussion about that issue. > > Regards, > Armin > > rule_cmp_test.py > 10KAfficherTélécharger -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pocoo-libs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pocoo-libs?hl=en.
