I just went ahead and made the changes and submitted a pull request. There were very few changes required. There was already a logbook.helpers.u() function; it just wasn't being used everywhere.
Pull request: https://github.com/mitsuhiko/logbook/pull/99 On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Randall Nortman <[email protected]>wrote: > It looks like python 3.2 is not supported in logbook due to the use of > u"foo" unicode literals. Any reason not to use six's u() function, or a > version of it bundled with logbook? The problem is that lots of production > environments only have 3.2 (the latest in Debian stable/Wheezy). If I make > the changes and submit a pull request, would it be accepted? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pocoo-libs" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pocoo-libs. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pocoo-libs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pocoo-libs. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
