On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 10:14:44AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> They're missing features.  Neither pod2text nor pod2man have ever done
> this to my knowledge.  (I really dislike this corner of POD semantics,
> BTW.  Interpretation of an L<> directive should not depend on knowledge of
> all of the headings in the document.)

Well, I would substitute "should not" by "should", and everything
becomes OK.  ;-)

You optimize for a writer of pod2xxx.  POD is optimized for writers of POD.

Ilya

Reply via email to