Sean M Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I sense a crucial divergence between what I'm saying, and what you think
> I'm saying. I did not say that as of Saturday, I would declare perlpod
> and perlpodspec done forever, and reject any further comments on them,
> under penalty of vitrification and/or defenestration.
> What I did say is that people can't talk to be about DRAFT ONE of each,
> after Saturday -- because that's when I expire DRAFT ONE, and go off and
> feverishly try producing draft two. I very much hope to have draft two
> out by mid September, in time for you to read. Once they're out, people
> can talk to me those.
Ah! Okay. Never mind, then. :)
> What you apparently thought I said, was this:
> Pod FORMATTERS MUST NEVER try to...
> Pod::Man can continue to intelligently turn "--" into E<emdash> as it
> sees fit, because it's not a parser, it's a formatter.
Oops. Okay, that makes much more sense, and I have no objections to that
at all. Clearly I should actually *read* the documents, and I'm sorry to
have butted in with a complete misunderstanding. Reassured that there
isn't a rush, I will now crawl back into my hole and try to get back to
all of this in a month or two. *wry grin*
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
