Under Win98 & Win2k with ActivePerl 5.8 b804, this problem exists for me,
also, someone in the perl-win32-users list mentioned this prob yesterday.

Also, this thing does not exists in the 5.6.1 version...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean M. Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 11:07 AM
> To: Philip Newton
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: perldoc, under MSWin and otherwise
>
>
> At 07:58 AM 2003-01-25 +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> >On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 18:19:14 -0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sean M. Burke)
> >wrote:
> >
> > > Someone mentioned to me that people on p5p were talking about perldoc
> > under
> > > MSWin going kookoo when using more as the pager.  I've just tried
> > > reproducing the problem and can't.
> >
> >Did you use Win9x/ME? Or NT/2K/XP? I can imagine the problem is only on
> >the former series. (I saw it on a Win98SE machine with ActivePerl's
> >5.8.0.)
>
> I've tried reproducing the problem with 5.8.0 and Pod::Perldoc,
> under both
> 98 and under XP, and there's no problem.
>
> > > Pod::Perldoc has a great deal of MSWin-specific hacks in it already
> > (like a
> > > bunch of temp-file stuff -- File::Temp doesn't get used at
> all under MSWin
> > > -- see the code around "sub new_tempfile")
> >since I think the problem is with File::Temp creating files in binmode.
> >So if that's not used, the problem might go away.
>
> Yup.  I can't even really remember what was the last straw in my deciding
> to not use File::Temp under MSWin.  I think it might have been that
> unlinking an open file under MSWin is a bad idea, and that means that you
> really cannot go unlinking a file when the pager command returns,
> since the
> pager command might just be a command to /start/ up a real pager on the
> output file.
>
> So once I realized I didn't want all the unlinking tricks that File::Temp
> does, I decided I should just write my own routine for when we're running
> under MSWin (otherwise we go ahead and use File::Temp).  Like
> some sort of
> horrid coelanth, my MSWin_perldoc_tempfile is specially adapted to its
> horrible environment: For example, it doesn't just use $$ in the tempfile
> name, since MSWin recycles $$ numbers almost immediately (!).  So it
> actually uses a combination of time(), $$, and the lower 8 bits of
> Win32::GetTickCount(), all in a do {...} while -e $tempfilespec loop.
>
> Anyway, it's good to hear that my abandoning File::Time for MSWin had some
> fringe benefits.
>
> --
> Sean M. Burke    http://search.cpan.org/~sburke/
>

Reply via email to