At 07:00 PM 2003-08-21 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Either way, what about the alternative formattings that don't appear to need
look-aheads?
[namely:]
And if it doesn't have an ordered list starting at 1, simply treat it like
any normal list of strings.

Hm, could be a /bit/ tricky, but I think it's probably feasible, by just making _get_item_type even more horribly incestuous than it already is. I'll have a look at this soon.


--
Sean M. Burke    http://search.cpan.org/~sburke/



Reply via email to