Sean M Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ and whoever else has a hand in Pod::Man,
Mostly just me. > Lately, I've been poking at reworking Pod::Man (as Pod::Simple::Man) to > use Pod::Simple instead of Pod::Parser, with the eventual hope of giving > Pod::Parser the solemn viking funeral that it so richly deserves. > So far, my adaptation, Pod::Simple::Man, is passing regression tests > pretty well, and I've managed to avoid too much change by writing a sort > of Pod::Parser-emulator class that Pod::Simple::Man just derives from. > Will you folks have time soon to take a look at the class > (Pod::Simple::Man, that is) and tell me if you could maintain it? Sure! Thank you very much for doing this work. > Once I'm thru messing with it in the next few days, I can cook up an > archive of the code, and the test corpus, and all the differences > (hopefully insignificant) between the output it makes and the output > Pod::Man makes, given the same input. That would be great. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
