On Jun 7, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote: > If I understand things correctly, then when you say L<foo> in something that > becomes a section header, the TOC links to it by doing something morally > equivalent to L<L<foo>|/foo>, which is obviously nuts.
Yeah. > Restated: > > * =head2 L<bar|foo> becomes "<a id='head1_foo' href='foo'>bar</a>" > * the TOC links with <a href="#head1_foo"><a href='foo'>bar</a></a> > > The text of the link in the TOC should be the same as the text of the thing to > which it's linking. So the TOC should link with: > > <a href="#head1_foo">bar</a> Yes. > ...and if you'd said (you can say this, right?) "L<< The B<Big> Bang|boom >>" > then the TOC should have something like: > > <a href="#head1_boom">The <strong>Big</strong> Bang</a> > > This email has received about 120s of thought, so it might be a terrible idea. > It feels pretty sound, though. (Oh, but I totally punted on the #-anchors > there. They weren't really at issue, right?) Not sure. I would not be surprised if they were rendered as: <a id="head1_boom"><a href="http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?foo";>bar</a></a> If so, it should obviously be corrected to: <a id="head1_boom" href="http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?foo";>bar</a> I will update the ticket. David
