Ricardo Signes <perl....@rjbs.manxome.org> writes:

> Almost certainly, as Grant said, the authors should have limited the Pod
> tests to their release process.

Well, I'm definitely never going to do that.  What's the point in tests if
no one runs them?  Things break after the release because of exactly
things like this.  I would much rather have tests fail so that routine
CPAN tests notice that my module is broken than install broken
documentation with warning sections.

> Basically every tool that does CPAN installs will refuse to install if
> the test suite fails, and this isn't going to be viewed as buggy or
> changed.

Do they at least tell people how to install the module anyway if the test
failure doesn't look serious?

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply via email to