Have you looked at Pod::Weaver? It's usually used as part of Dist::Zilla, but it absolutely can be used on its own, and it's great for parsing pod documents into separate pieces. I'm also a big fan of Pod::Simple.
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 3:59 PM Harald Jörg <h...@posteo.de> wrote: > > Hello Pod-People, > > I hope that I don't start a religious war with this question. > I found this mailing list advertised in the Pod::Simple docs, so I would > accept a bias towards Pod::Simple based solutions :) > > So here's what I want to do: Extract Pod from a bunch of (ca 100) Perl > modules and Pod files and convert it to HTML. Or XHTML. Anything good > for today's browsers is fine. Sounds pretty TIMTOWTDI, but every way > I've tried so far has minor issues, and I've some requirements for which > I haven't found an existing solution yet. > > The issues are rather harmless: > > - Pod::POM is what's used today in the software to create the HTML > docs. It fails to process L<The Perl Homepage|https://www.perl.org> > links correctly. > > - Pod::Simple::HTML produces invalid HTML (nested 'a' elements) when a > heading or item contains a Link like this: > > =head1 Start at L<https://www.perl.org> > > - Pod::Simple::XHTML apparently makes no effort to find content for the > <title> element (nor does core pod2html, BTW). > > And there are a few things I miss. They could be implemented in a > subclass of either of these, or even provided as an enhancement via Pull > Request: > > - A custom link resolver: I want links to documents within the project > to be relative, but link to other CPAN modules to be > absolute. Preferably to metacpan.org instead of search.cpan.org. > > - A custom table of contents > > - Custom (or just different) backlinks to top of page > > - Decent heuristics for page titles (Pod::Simple::PullParser does that > marvelously) > > - ...and some more, but not enough to roll out my own converter. > > So, which if the modules is considered "state of the art" by the Pod > People? Which one of them is least likely to be deprecated? > > Do others have similar requirements? > -- > Cheers, > haj