>> This way we could support different output stream libraries and keep
boost maybe as an optional dependency. What do the others think? Does
this all make sense?

Dom & Craig,

>From a package integration point of view, I really prefer to have
further dependencies kept to a minimum, especially with multiple
platform and multiple compiler ports looming. If you do bring in boost,
I would prefer it optional so we could build without it for
core functionality.

Best Regards - Ian
-- 
-- Ian -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ---

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users

Reply via email to