Am 18.02.2008 um 15:59 schrieb Leonard Rosenthol: > On Feb 18, 2008, at 9:29 AM, Martin Schröder wrote: > >> 2008/2/18, Leonard Rosenthol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> No, that is not true. >>> >>> You can have individual parts inherited... >> >> IMHO that's not really clear from pages 123f of the PDF Ref 1.6; I >> suggest clarifying it in future versions of the standard. >> >> Best >> Martin > > I believe that we have done so fro the ISO 32000 version of the > document. > > Leonard >
Can you share that clarification with us? I checked the definition of the /Resources entry in a page dictionary on page 145 of the 1.7 specification and it still says: * Resources * dictionary * (Required; inheritable) A dictionary containing any resources required by the page (see Section 3.7.2, “Resource Dictionaries”). If the page requires no resources, the value of this entry should be an empty dictionary. Omitting the entry entirely indicates that the resources are to be inherited from an ancestor node in the page tree. Are you saying that this should be interpreted that an empty dictionary as the value of the /Resources entry will be enriched with any entries in /Resources dictionaries from ancestor nodes? Would that process also happen at lower levels, ie. that if the current /Resources dictionary has an /XObject entry, will that be enriched by any XObjects declared at an ancestor node? If this is the case, it should be clearly documented indeed! Regards, /Andreas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
