crypto++ would be useful for standard crypto, but wouldn't help with DigSig or Signature-based crypto.
Try libeay (part of openssl). Leonard On May 8, 2008, at 7:03 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: > Dom, > > Regarding PoDoFo's encryption needs, have you looked at the crypto++ > library? I had a quick glance and it looks quite interesting. It'd be > nice not to have to maintain a bunch of forked (or just copied) > code for > crypto. > > -- > Craig Ringer > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save > $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http:// > java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > Podofo-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
