Hi Jared, Personally, I am fine with linking to PoDoFo statically. Don't know if I can speak here for everyone who has contributed. I even think we had this question several times before on this list ...
There are plenty of articles on the net about this confusing situation because of the App-Store and the LGPL.*I* would go and link statically to any library. If someone *really* want's to change the PoDoFo version you link to, you still have the option to distribute your object code, so that anyone can relink to a patched PoDoFo. This is explained more in detail in this article: http://multinc.com/2009/08/24/compatibility-between-the-iphone-app-store-and-the-lgpl/ Regards, Dom On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Jared Forbes <jared.lu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Podofo creators > > Firstly thanks for creating such a great library. > I have use the library in an Android app that emails information as a nicely > formatted PDF. I want to release the app on the Apple App Store but need to > statically link the library due to Apples restrictions. From my > understanding this would be at odds with the LGPL licence. > Can you let me know your policy on statically linking the Library? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb > _______________________________________________ > Podofo-users mailing list > Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
