Hi all,

is podofobrowser really supposed to still build (and run)
correctly with the current PoDoFo version? I know it needs
Qt 4 ... I haven't been posting for the last 1.5 months
because I've had much to do for studies and high load at my
job, I'd like to post a patch which really corrects the memory
handling of PdfOutlineItem, please understand that the revision
number of next revision is really significant for me, I really
hope my patch will be next to acceptance next weekend ...

Best regards, mabri



----- Original Message -----
From: zyx <z...@litepdf.cz>
To: podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, 19 August 2016, 06:48 UTC
Betreff: Re: [Podofo-users] Issues running cmake podofobrowser

On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 00:20 +0200, Salahuddin Asjad wrote:
> When I run the command, I get the error shown in the picture.

    Hi,
first of all, why a picture, when you can copy&paste a text from a
terminal? You sent almost 190KB image (+ size for base64 encoding over
the wire) for a *text* information which can use, I do not know, up to
3KB? What a waste of bandwidth, everyone's mailbox and everything.

Anyway, the CMake says somewhere in the middle of the picture:
> CMake Error: The following....
(I'm really not going to retype that whole paragraph from the picture).

When you fix that, then it'll build. Basically, STLPORT wasn't found,
which is an optional dependency, thus no big deal, but also freetype
wasn't found, which is required.
    Bye,
    zyx

-- 
http://www.litePDF.cz                                 i...@litepdf.cz


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users

Reply via email to