On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 06:59:32PM +0000, Mark Rogers wrote: > I’m not certain if PoDoFo makes any guarantees on binary compatibility > between releases (although C++ makes it hard to provide any guarantee > on binary compatibility). These patches will break binary > compatibility (by changing the memory layout of member variables) but > won’t affect source compatibility.
I don't think this is interesting, considering that every PoDoFo release
increments the SONAME used (matching the actual PoDoFo version), which
is safe way to be able to just ignore binary compatibility across
releases.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
