Hello all,

what do you think about Dominik Seichter's suggestion [1]
to extract PdfRecursionGuard to its own file then to fix 
recursion issues in other places, namely CVE-2018-8002 [2]
(I'm of the opinion that fixing a CVE should take some
precedence over supporting everything that's, at least
theoretically, permissible according to the PDF spec)
and issue 25 [3] (in a PdfOutlineItem constructor)?

Especially @Committers: If you're OK with it, I'd do
both changes (extracting & then using it to do CVE fixes,
without changing the settings, I can only test with Linux).

Best regards, mabri

[1] https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/7/#acda
[2] https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/15
[3] https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/25


_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users

Reply via email to