On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 21:02 +0100, Michal Sudolsky wrote:
> And podofo cannot handle such situation.
Hi,
I do not have any knowledge or opinion on the matter, but I'm
wondering: in what way PoDoFo cannot handle such situation, please? As
long as PoDoFo does not render the content (which it doesn't), then the
validity or completeness of the font descriptions doesn't matter, as
long as the library user can get to the objects/dictionaries on his/her
own, no? The only affected part would be when opening such a PDF file
and trying to check some string widths or anything like that, which I,
personally, consider in the same bucket as PDF content rendering.
I always understood PoDoFo as a library to read and manipulate PDF
files, with some higher API for some common parts, but which are
optional, because the library user can always use the low level API and
do all of that on its own. I never understood PoDoFo as a library for
easier rendering of the PDF content.
Bye,
zyx
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
