Allright, let me revert my commit and apply your latest set of patches.

Br
Dominik

Federico Kircheis <federico.kirch...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 6. Jan.
2021, 22:14:

> On 06/01/2021 20.21, Dominik Seichter wrote:
> > Sorry, now I missed this mail while working on your previous mail and
> patch!
>
> NP.
>
> >
> > Could you please check the current state in SVN?
> > I think the date handling after your previous patch was ok - do you
> agree?
>
> After the previous mail I thought that D:2012<garbage> gets parsed as
> 2012... so an error is IMHO better.
>
> I also do not think there are really documents that use something like
> D:20120 instead of D:2012 or D:201201 as valid date on purpose...
>
> > Can you send a patch only for the PdfDate clean up please?
>
> You mean without adding the error-detection?
>
> Can do it.
> If you take the part with the tests out it should already apply cleanly,
> as I worked on the patch sent previously (I did not see changes on your
> side on PDFDate, but could have missed them).
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >   Dominik
> >
>
> Federico
>
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users

Reply via email to