01-06-18 17.30, skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED] p� [EMAIL PROTECTED] f�ljande:
>
> On 18-Jun-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Kernel: line 913 or so includes.
>>
>>
>> unless (exists $kr_sessions{$session}) {
>>
>> if (TRACE_EVENTS) { # include
>> warn ">>> discarding $state to nonexistent ", {% ssid %}, "\n";
>> } # include
>>
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> I was thinking of moving this down to be executed after the pre hook,
>> this would allow hooks to implment sessions that are not avaible in the
>> kernel. Does this sound like a good or bad idea? I dunno. Comments
>> please
>
> Good idea. It would make IKC and stem integration easier.
>
> -Philip
>
I was thinking it would be neat if one could override everything that has
with sessions to do so one could completly make a session work ontop of
hooks. That would great for proxying session requests over IKC IMHO.
