On 27-Jun-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i cannot come up with an alternative draft right now because i don't
> have the time. i just want to say that to me it still needs a lot of
> time till we can start coding ... we should use the opportunity and
> develop something really good. at take all the time we need...
The problem is that I need an object layer TODAY.
OK, not that pressing, I could continue to use hacks for a month or so and
then go back to refactor all my code when I find something that pleases
me. In fact, I'm tempted to plow ahead with something based on what I
posted today, like I did with IKC.
Yes, it would be fun if we all used the same object layer. I think this
is quiotix... but we should establish standards of interoperability.
I don't see how interactions/relationships couldn't be layered on top of
the smallest object layer possible.
> i think this should work. there are special languages that already deal
> with concurrent tasks and dependencies and locks ..., maybe we could use
> one of these. there are some that are made for realtime environmentes.
> POE isn't realtime of course. but we don't need hard realtime, just
> fair scheduling and soft deadlines for timeouts etc.
I'v realised that scripting should be done on Objects, not Session. Also,
I'm currently not so much interested in scripting as postbacks and defered
postbacks.
Would you have any pointers to these special languages.
-Philip
