On 04-Oct-2001 Rocco Caputo wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:00:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > Paused events will complicate the queue and dispatch logic. For now > I'm experimenting with pausing the event generator instead. From this > point of view, it looks like a simpler flow control issue. Is it too > simplistic, though? What problems have I overlooked?
Wouldn`t a paused event just go on the end of the queue? Or would this be wasteful, as events get pulled off, barriered, pushed back on etc etc. -Philip
