On (02/08/02 00:02), Rocco Caputo wrote: > > If you have problems, questions, patches, let me know. > > Squirrels haunt my dreams, but I've learned to cope.
you too? i thought it was just me. > > Speaking of new session types, do we have an official object layer rfc > > yet? i was thinking of poking at that soon but i dont want to if there > > isnt a consensus on it and an rfc. :) > > Sorry, no there. There are a buttload of willy-nilly notes, though, > at: http://poe.perl.org/?POE_RFCs/object_layer > > Consolidating them will be a bit harder than combining the notes on > signal fixes. It's a much bigger topic. see, signal's have rfcs and specs and previous implementations. near as i can tell, object layer stuff doesnt share that. so, all you out there who care about object layer stuff, get together, draft an rfc and i'll see about coding it. deal? great. m.
