On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 14:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 12:27:02PM -0400, Al Tobey wrote: > > Note that I think creating a custom description language/format within > > POE would likely be much more efficient than using UML. I don't > > remember seeing any UML-type modules on CPAN. Although, the XML modules > > are quite nice - I've used XML::Parser::PerlSAX a few times and it's > > event-based parsing style should be right at home with people used to > > POE. Perhaps XML is what you want ... > > Uhm, no. :) XML is a markup language, UML a modelling language. XMI seems > the way to represents UML in XML. But thanks for your comments. I mean as a description language, not for modelling. Something was mentioned about a programmatic way of describing interfaces to be used during runtime, or I misinterpreted. That said, SOAP or parts of it may be useful, since much code has been written already. UDDI may be useful for locating resources on the network. > > torvald
******************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the Priority Health Information Services Department at (616) 942-0954. ********************************************************************
