On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 03:47:09PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:38:55 -0400, Rocco Caputo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't know how long Windows 2000 waits for connect() to fail. > Uncomment the EWOULDBLOCK line in SocketFactory.pm, and be patient. > See if it doesn't fail to connect after a few minutes. > > Well, here are the (digested) results:
[...] > The above deletion occurred when I terminated the script. It seems that > ten minutes is long enough. I suppose I could let it run overnight, but > the idea is that it return with an error in a timely fashion (I'm okay with > two or three minutes, but not ten). I am running the script with a bogus > remote host address (The script will be configured at remote sites by > unfamiliar people, so it needs to be robust and report decent errors). I > am going to impliment this with Net::FTP and see if there is any > difference. I could see nothing wrong in the results. Did Net::FTP work any better? -- Rocco Caputo / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / poe.perl.org / poe.sf.net
