> In my case, lack of response means I'm busy I'll second that motion. I do have an interest in this idea and will reread the original message before commenting but given that Philip mentions object persistence I should just hit that I'm working at a schema layer, perhaps similar to Java Entity Beans. someday I foresee a nice mixture of this with IKC to do replication stuff.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:06 AM To: Rocco Caputo; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RFC: Persistent Object Client/Server Scheme On 11-Feb-2003 Rocco Caputo wrote: >> Would a server helper module like OOPersistServer be a >> candidate to be a genuine POE::Component::Server? > > The lack of response to this message seems to indicate no. :( In my case, lack of response means I'm busy. Object persistance is something I've wrestled with often. My latest stab was for JAAS (just another application server). I have some ideas about object persistance that I would like to share, but lack of tuits has held me back. -Philip
