On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 07:17:21PM -0400, Dan McCormick wrote: > [...] > > Thus allowing the user to decide what gets handed back to Gtk could be > handy.
I agree. Have callbacks return whatever the call() does. You also wrote in a previous message: > I wasn't sure what to do with the various auxiliary bits, though. Would > you like me to create a CALLBACK_RETVAL, POE::Session::Callback::DESTROY > method, and %callback_parent_id hash, and call refcount_increment with a > 'callback' identifier, or just use the the postback versions of those? > > Of course, since it's synchronous, I'm pretty sure inc'ing and dec'ing > the refcounts shouldn't matter, so I could also just take those bits > out. I also agree with this. Callbacks should therefore be pretty darned simple. -- Rocco Caputo - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://poe.perl.org/
