On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 04:23:44PM -0800, Scott wrote: > > However, I just want to know if anyone applied the patch, had problems > applying the patch or running the tests afterwards, or any such thing. > > I think a $_[SESSION]->call() is a great idea for a number of reasons, > offers an interface to high level event routing for component writers should > they want to do so, offers an optimization for the wheel implementations > (Although the wheel things have been argued to suck for a variety of > reasons, > no reason to not make them faster), and a yield-like convienent > intra-session > interface for call ($_[SESSION]->call(state => @args) - obviously). > > But again, I'm just really itching to know if anyone had any luck with these > patches...c'mon I'm looking for feedback here people.!
I looked in the patch, but I haven't installed it or anything. I'm still waiting for people to get involved with design discussion on the list. I'm glad you don't support inter-session calling. You really can't do that without at least setting POE::Kernel's notion of the active session. Otherwise a callee's alarms (and other resources) will be associated with the caller session. That's obviously wrong. -- Rocco Caputo - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://poe.perl.org/
