On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:40:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [been on holiday and just found this email... sorry for slow response]
Cool. E-mail is much more tolerant of that sort of thing than other media. > I think that your examples make sense, although I need to read them when > I've had more coffee... the key thing is for a session to be able to say > that it's blocked waiting for a waitqueue to do something and that to be a > valid state. I'm going to treat this as a "will get back to you" or "waiting for" or "bring forward" and just keep the thread around 'til you've had more time to look into it. Oh, would this be similar to a signals/sockets mechanism? In other words, do wait queues equate to sockets, and wakeups to signals? If you've got some URLs or other citations to the specific wait queues you're thinking of, they'd rock too. -- Rocco Caputo - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://poe.perl.org/
