Hum, if the first DNS servers works, why should it try the
other ones?

--- Lari Huttunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I have been trying to wrap my brain around the POE
> framework for a
> couple of days reading through the docs and trying out
> different
> things. I managed to modify the reference implementation
> of concurrent
> DNS resolver
> <URL:http://poe.perl.org/?POE_Cookbook/DNS_Lookups> to a
> PERL package, which expects an array ref of IP addresses
> as input and
> returns a hash ref of ip to name mappings as output. This
> now seems to
> work fine, except for the fact that the resolvers utilize
> only the
> first nameserver on the list passed to
> Net::DNS::Resolver, i.e.
> 
> POE::Component::Client::DNS->spawn(
>     Alias  => 'resolver',
>     Timeout=> 30,
>     Nameservers => [qw(10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.3)],
> );
> 
> will only query the first server on the list (the test
> material
> consisted of about hundred IP adresses).
> 
> 10.0.0.10.1443 > 10.0.0.1.53: PTR?
> nn.nn.nn.nn.in-addr.arpa. (44)
> 10.0.0.10.1444 > 10.0.0.1.53: PTR?
> nn.nn.nn.nn.in-addr.arpa. (43)
> ..
> 
> In other words the resolution seems to working in
> parallel, but only
> the first name server is queried.  I have set the number
> of parallel
> workers to 9 through:
> 
> sub INITIAL_COUNT () { 9 }
> 
> This doesn't seem a bug in POE unless passing the
> Nameservers parameter
> in POE::Component::Client::DNS is somehow botched, which
> does not seem 
> to be the case. Reading the source code for
> Net::DNS::Resolver did not
> yield any obvious answers either. 
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> Anyway, thanks for the developers and contributors for a
> great 
> parallel programming framework! :) The learning curve is
> steep 
> but at least I have been able to take the first wobbly
> steps through
> perusing the rather extensive but "distributed"
> documentation. ;)
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Lari Huttunen
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to