Matt S Trout wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:19:04AM -0500, Wiggins d'Anconia wrote: > >>I hate to say it but with all your various systems, protocols, etc. I >>would start from scratch with an XML based config system. I don't throw >>out XML lightly as I think it is overkill for a lot of things, but with >>all the different setups you are talking about it can be very effective. >> XML::Simple should do nicely. > > > At least a couple of people are using my Class::XML to automatically load > a tree of config objects from an XML file in a relatively clean format. I > find it much less of a pain in the neck, anyway :) >
Looks interesting, more complex than I have ever needed. And I have never really used Class::DBI so it wouldn't be an easy jump for me. But I will certainly consider it in the future, especially for anything complex I get into. Been meaning to take Class::DBI for a test drive too. http://danconia.org
