Nick, thanks for the help. IKC seems great for most of this.....what about the future if I wanted to swap out a a perl worker for a C worker? Would I use JSONRPC instead of IKC for my communication? Would it be easy to mix/match?
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Nick Perez <[email protected]> wrote: > It really sounds like you need to segregate the webapp from the actual > daemon. And with that, you do not need to run POE within mod_perl (not > that you could anyhow). But you obviously need POE communication > between the web server and the POE daemon. So I recommend using > POE::Component::IKC::ClientLite > (http://search.cpan.org/~gwyn/POE-Component-IKC-0.2003/IKC/ClientLite.pm<http://search.cpan.org/%7Egwyn/POE-Component-IKC-0.2003/IKC/ClientLite.pm> > ). > As for worker/controller interaction, IKC can serve those needs too, > without having to involve a protocol layer beyond a TCP socket and the > serializer that IKC uses. >
