I'd like to take a look at PoCo-EasyDBI-Multiplex. Btw, I'm the EasyDBI author, so you can direct any questions about it to the list.
David Davis ☄ Software Engineer http://xant.us/ http://xantus.tel/ On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:16, Phil Whelan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I like POE-Component-EasyDBI > > Actually, I've written a wrapper module > POE-Component-EasyDBI-Multiplex, which I've not yet made public, but > we're using to manage a pool of EasyDBI connections. > POE-Component-EasyDBI-Multiplex uses the same interface as > POE-Component-EasyDBI, but the whole API is not fully support - we > just implemented what we needed. I can send the code to the list if > anyone is interested in using it. Hopefully, will get around to > packaging it up sooner or later. > > Thanks, > Phil > > -- > Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/philwhln > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Josh803316 <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've read the cpan module docs and have looked at the cookbook example ( > > http://poe.perl.org/?POE_Cookbook/DBI_Helper_Processes). The following > > modules all run non-blocking async dbi calls for poe but I'm not sure > which > > I should choose. I would love to see a pro/con list for these or get > some > > sort of guidance on which would work better in my network testing app. > > > > I'm sure everyone has favourites out there, but is there any reason to > use > > one over another in certain scenarios? Are there any drawbacks or things > to > > watch out for on specific modules? > > > > POE::Component::LaDBI > > > > POE::Component::EasyDBI > > > > POE::Component::DBIAgent > > > > POE::Component::SimpleDBI > > >
