This bug wouldn't necessarily stop 1.5.  This is a feature we don't
currently support (rich strings).  

I don't think this is so bad.  Its some sucky design on M$'s part, but
not so bad.  We just need a new String class that contains a string and
formatting information.

xAxBxC =

HSSFRichString
String data;
byte[] styleinfo;
String getString();
byte[] getRawString();

We'll need some methods to handle styling things.  Which means we need
to figure out what those styles mean.  We'll also need to know when to
use the Rich/Unicode/Compressed Unicode.  Not a big deal IMO, just one
more feat in the quest for catching all the strange cases of HSSF
records.

-Andy

On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 06:47, Glen Stampoultzis wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > Well, it's plain to me, then, that what SST record needs to hold is not
> > plain strings (too bad) but the entire string data elements.
> 
> I figured as much.  It's slightly tricky since it's exposed in the user
> model as string (as it probably should be) so which SST string you should
> match against becomes a little confused.
> 
> I'm begining to think we'll never get 1.5 out the door... *sigh*
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Glen Stampoultzis  (TriNexus Pty Ltd)
> +63 3 9753-6850     0402 835 458
> ICQ:  62722370    EMail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
-- 
http://www.superlinksoftware.com
http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - port of Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound
Document 
                            format to java
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html 
                        - fix java generics!
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
vote.
-Ambassador Kosh

  • Re: SST Andrew C. Oliver
    • Andrew C. Oliver

Reply via email to