Is that the one you ride to work??  Do you sleep with a pet koala bear? 
 (you must realize this is my conceptualization of Austrailia in general 
;-) )

Glen Stampoultzis wrote:

>I might try and look into it tomorrow (oops today now)...  First I must
>sleep and dream of kangaroos.
>
>Night.
>
>-- Glen
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:14 AM
>Subject: Re: Wrong result from numberic cell value with v1.5.0-dev-20020416
>
>
>>True but a straight double isn't accurate to that many decimal places.
>> I think that we don't know for sure is the result of a lack of unit
>>tests in this area of the software.
>>
>>I think this is a great area for some of those who've written in saying
>>"I want to get involved" to help contribute and a great place to get
>>started.
>>
>>Anyhow, I don't have sufficient cycles to look into this yet.  I've got
>>a large backlog of things I've already called as mine.
>>
>>-Andy
>>
>>Glen Stampoultzis wrote:
>>
>>>Strange, it's stored internally in Excel as a double and we're just using
>>>standard Java routines to convert to a double from bytes.  The error is
>>>reasonably large too.
>>>
>>>-- Glen
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:30 PM
>>>Subject: Re: Wrong result from numberic cell value with
>>>
>v1.5.0-dev-20020416
>
>>>
>>>>Anyone have any thoughts on this one?
>>>>
>>>>Teutscher, Uwe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>But with poi version 1.0.1 I get the correct result.
>>>>>I think this is a step back.
>>>>>
>>>>>Uwe
>>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>>>Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 2:05 PM
>>>>>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>>>>>Subject: Re: Wrong result from numberic cell value with
>>>>>v1.5.0-dev-20020416
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes this is a documentation bug.  We're using double.  double rounding
>>>>>is not 100% accurate.  Future versions may support BigDecimal as well,
>>>>>but not the current dev version.  If you round to the expected decimal
>>>>>places you should get acceptable results.
>>>>>
>>>>>If someone wants to do a BigDecimal patch that provides it in addition
>>>>>to double, then I'll gladly commit it.
>>>>>
>>>>>-Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 05:20, Teutscher, Uwe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I have the following problem with POI versions
>>>>>>jakarta-poi-1.5.0-dev-20020416-bin and version 1.4583.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I get the wrong result back when I read a cell with the vale 987.01.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>public class Test {
>>>>>>  public static void main(String[] args)  throws IOException {
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      POIFSFileSystem fs = new POIFSFileSystem(new
>>>>>>FileInputStream("test.xls"));
>>>>>>      HSSFWorkbook wb = new HSSFWorkbook(fs);
>>>>>>      HSSFSheet sheet = wb.getSheetAt(0);
>>>>>>      HSSFRow row = sheet.getRow(0);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      HSSFCell cell = row.getCell((short)0);
>>>>>>      System.out.println("> " + cell.getNumericCellValue());
>>>>>>      cell = row.getCell((short)1);
>>>>>>      System.out.println("> " + cell.getNumericCellValue());
>>>>>>      cell = row.getCell((short)2);
>>>>>>      System.out.println("> " + cell.getNumericCellValue());
>>>>>>      cell = row.getCell((short)3);
>>>>>>      System.out.println("> " + cell.getNumericCellValue());
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>}
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The excel file test.xls has one row with 4 cells:
>>>>>>987.0 987.01 987.02 987.011
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The result is:
>>>>>>987.0
>>>>>>987.010625
>>>>>>987.020625
>>>>>>987.011
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thanks for your help
>>>>>>
>>>><snip content="attachment that I can't decode anyhow"/>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



Reply via email to