From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I realize what you're trying to do Ken and I think its very cool, but
> there are practical concerns at work here as well. I propose we:
>
> 1. add the dependancies from centepede last known good back into CVS
> 2. I will (if Ken is unwilling) make sure it is kept reasonably up to date
> 3. document the process of deleting and automatically downloading newer
> versions of centipede.
> 4. your thoughts here.
I'm -0 on this.
To be honest, I always liked having all that is needed in CVS, but as I
recalled in an earlier mail, it's mostly a $$ problem.
Anyway, the automatic download can still be useful to update locally the new
cents to commit (point 2).
Point 3 is on the way, and thank you all for the patience.
As per point 4... why not put in CVS only the core cents needed?
For example keep centipede.cent in CVS and others to download, so that basic
build would still work, but not the extra targets.
I will have to change the build process a bit, to ignore cents if marked as
optional.
Could this be ok?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
