Right, but umm, when that runs, X still loads right? or maybe you're
planning a property to turn it off? You'll need the quotes of course.
-Andy
Drew Varner wrote:
>I'd prefer something more elegant. How about I use...
>
>Class.forName(java.awt.BufferedImage)
>
>and catch exceptions in the test and handle it gracefully? That way we don't
>have to hack apart the script for headless servers.
>
>- Drew
>
>Quoting "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>No, I have no problem with it. It would be nice if you put some kind of
>>easy to auto delete filename for it. Something like testBlaBlaAWT so
>>that those who for some reason choose to build on a headless server can
>>find . -name "*AWT.java" -exec rm '{}' ';' -- but this isn't something
>>that would affect me as I'd have no reason to run the unit tests on my
>>server. I guess its possible we may one day move the nightly builds to
>>a commodity server, so best do something that can be easily removed via
>>a script if you don't mind.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>-Andy
>>
>>On Sat, 2002-04-27 at 22:10, Drew Varner wrote:
>>
>>>Does anyone have a problem with me importing java.awt.BufferedImage
>>>
>>for the
>>
>>>purposes of a JUnit test?
>>>
>>>I'd like to examine the image (check width, height, etc.) via the
>>>
>>Image methods
>>
>>>as a sanity check when extracting the byte array. It seems like a good
>>>
>>way
>>
>>>tomake sure the byte array isn't garbage. I don't think JAI or other
>>>
>>standard
>>
>>>Java Image toolkits support WMF files. I'll investigate more.
>>>
>>>Drew
>>>___________________
>>>Drew Varner
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>--
>>http://www.superlinksoftware.com
>>http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - port of Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound
>>Document
>> format to java
>>http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html
>> - fix java generics!
>>The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
>>vote.
>>-Ambassador Kosh
>>
>>
>
>
>
>___________________
>Drew Varner
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
