I agree. Would seem to fit into the Morphos project goals better than Poi. Then again, I really don't care _that_ much. :)
-- Glen > From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I disagree, I think the windows specific file format stuff (WMF) should > > end up in a package of POI. > > Ha. > > > (I'm okay with that package being tied to > > awt as its strictly image related so long as other packages dont > > directly link to it and make X a requirement). IT could also be a jar > > in and of itself so that BAtik could import it. I think it woudl get > > better exposure for what it is over here too. (If I'm looking for WMF > > am I going to think Batik or POI? Probably POI...the actual SVG stuff > > I'd think Batik)... maybe its me. I realize this would be a political > > nightmere "give us your code because it makes the most sense to have it > > here rather than there" -- but *shrug* it does. > > > > Thats just my thought. I've no real objection to it going in commons. > > It's Morphos, man. I thought we agreed to keep POI as lean as possible for > the time being. > > Let's do this: Drew, just do it, send it here, and we will put it or in Poi, > or in Commons. > The final line is: we want it :-) > > -- > Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - verba volant, scripta manent - > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > On Sun, 2002-04-28 at 18:11, Drew Varner wrote: > > > I agree. Should be our (my) toil. > > > > > > - Drew > > > > > > Quoting Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Drew Varner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 10:52 PM > > > > Subject: Re: Numeric Types in org.apache.poi.hpsf.littleendian > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > What is appropriate is to ask Batik to put the WMF > > > > > rasterizing classes into the Commons. It'd be a small, modular > > > > component > > > > useful > > > > > in applications that need to use and <rant>manipulate</rant> OLE2 > > > > data. > > > > > > > > Let's put it this way: What is appropriate is to put the Batik WMF > > > > rasterizing classes into the Commons. > > > > > > > > Reap the code from Batik, make it work on its own, and I will put it > in > > > > Commons Scratchpad. > > > > > > > > When it's done, we'll se if they want to use the Commons version ;-) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - verba volant, scripta manent - > > > > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________ > > > Drew Varner > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > http://www.superlinksoftware.com > > http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - port of Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound > > Document > > format to java > > http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html > > - fix java generics! > > The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to > > vote. > > -Ambassador Kosh > > > > >
