Everything working and working under GUMP is what is important. Everything else is superfluous.
-Andy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I may be a bit biased since I am a maven committer :-) My main focus has been in the testing realm, working primarily on the cactus maven plugin.
What I think would be the most difficult aspect for maven and poi is the
various jars that poi produces. The main jar, and then the various contrib
and scratchpad jars. However, if you used maven's reactor capabilities, and
made poi a single project, and the contrib and scrathpad inheriting
projects, then you could have the multple source trees that poi seems to
like.
I just like all the pregenerated source documentation and the source x-ref html pages, I find I hit them as often as my javadocs! Having both Centipede and Maven competing will only lead to better tools!
Eric Pugh
-----Original Message----- From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:02 PM To: POI Users List Subject: RE: Build in disrepair Re: Where are the convenience functions fo
At 01:29 AM 18/03/2003, you wrote:
I nominate maven, just because of all the plugin integration.. But
definitly lets see what centipede can do first!
Centipede's got a pretty good selection of plugins too... Were there any of mavens plugins which you were particularly interested in?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
