I'm inclined to agree. Editors that do the \uxxx are not common in countries such as Spain, Mexico, the US. This would constitute a nasty barrier to entry that would probably discourage contribution.
-Andy On 6/19/03 6:11 PM, "Rainer Klute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 03:31:39 +0900 Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> I think that some of current documents (e.g. news.xml, trans/es/*.xml) >> have "ISO-8859-1" encoding style. However, my favorite text editor >> can not read them properly (garbled chars) at the point of >> "Umlauts" and "Ntildes" etc. > > I think each file should have the encoding that fits best for its particular > language. So please leave ISO-8859-1 for the western languages and use UTF-8 > or whatever fits best for Japanese. > > Best regards > Rainer Klute > > Rainer Klute IT-Consulting GmbH > Dipl.-Inform. > Rainer Klute E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > K�rner Grund 24 Telefon: +49 172 2324824 > D-44143 Dortmund Telefax: +49 231 5349423 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
