On 7/24/03 1:22 PM, "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before we release 2.0, the following are "must fix" bugs IMHO. Some need to > be researched and invalidated (if they aren't valid) or noted as "can't fix > till 3.0" (if they aren't tooooo serious and aren't blockers): > > 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6802 > 2. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11744 > 3. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12561 (Tetsuya?) > 4. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 > 5. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13224 (Avik & me) > 6. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13249 (Avik?) > 7. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 (ALL) > 8. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13921 > 9. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14734 (Rainer) > 10. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14824 > 11. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15375 (Glen?) > 12. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16488 (investigate) > 13. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16559 (Danny) > 14. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16560 (Danny) > 15. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16756 > 16. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16985 > 17. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17196 (Avik & Andy) > 18. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17329 (fixed?) > 19. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17374 (Andy) > 20. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17494 > 21. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18800 > 22. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19321 > 23. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19599 (Tetsuya?) > 24. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19961 > 25. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20048 > 26. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20550 > 27. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21066 > 28. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21646 > > Unlikely (Stranger than fiction) : > > 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14493 > > > PATCHES > > 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9576 > 2. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12843 > 3. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13229 (Glen, is this > relevant any more?) > 4. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13478 (Chris convinced > me) > 5. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15008 (Tetsuya) > 6. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16985 (Tetsuya) > 7. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18837 > 8. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18846 (Tetsuya) > 9. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21444 (AndY) > 10. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21673 > 11. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21674 > 12. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21722 (Andy) > > > Formula related, should look into (may not fix for 2.0-final) > * we probably shouldn't completely CHOKE on these when they can't be read > for final * > 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14330 > 2. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13796 > 3. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14460 > > > Stuff Avik and I haven't committed yet: > > 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15228 > > > Lets try and work through these so we can get 2.0 out of the door! -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
