I would suggest that SHOULD be two constructors if POIFS2 mandates 1.4 due to its use of NIO.
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 03:43, Chris Nokleberg wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:49:24AM +1100, Glen Stampoultzis wrote: > > Ideally (just to begin with) it would be great if it were possible to swap > > implementations at runtime. Chris, would this be possible? Going forward > > though it would be silly to maintain two separate implementations and one > > must eventually win out. > > I don't think there is a technical obstacle to having, for example, > multiple constructors in HSSFWorkbook that work with both POIFS impls, > although I agree it is a bit silly. Whatever bugs remain won't be found > until people actually use it. > > Chris > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
