I don't feel strongly about it but it may be confusing as that�s how we used to denote development releases. IIRC we voted to go to more of a Linux-style scheme (but no one including me noted it on the resolutions page so I promptly forgot the results -- bad me).
I'd hate to just call this 2.01 though...I mean this is a fat feature change... I guess I don't feel that strongly about it, just we should branch just in case and leave a little room for point releases along the BRANCH_2 stuff... I mean I'm sure its perfect and we have no serious bugs, but just in case. -Andy -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with everything espoused in the above email. > From: Glen Stampoultzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:22:51 +1100 > To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Commits branches and features oh my > > At 10:16 AM 10/02/2004, you wrote: >> I'd like to propose that we do a 2.5. . . . Oh I know I know >> we said never again, but this feature is far too mature for 3.0 and far to >> sweeping for a 2.01 release in my opinion. > > 2.1? > > > > > > Glen Stampoultzis > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
