Ok, I'll put it in. Dont assign bugs to yourself, leave it assigned to be the lists, else we cant figure when you put in new comments :)
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 05:30 -0700, Amol Deshmukh wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2005-06-01 > > 19:52 ------- > > Some testcases failed! > <snipped/> > > > > Not sure, but these seem to be places where you have > =NA() as > > the expected > > value. Can you pls investigate, thanks! > > > > > Avik, > > I presume you opened the test xls in OpenOffice. > The =NA() values are actually Error values > (#VALUE! etc.), since those tests check if the > evaluator can return error values when that is the > expectation. However, OpenOffice seems to evaluate > some of the formulas that return error in excel. > > I have fixed problems in the core eval classes that > was causing the automated tests to fail and updated > the patch - so the new patch file should be good to > go :) > > Regards, > ~ amol > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mailing List: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#poi > The Apache Jakarta POI Project: http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/ > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailing List: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#poi The Apache Jakarta POI Project: http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/