I've just mailed them the following patch:
http://jpoker.aminche.com/jscoverage-debian/debian/patches/01-fix-js-manpages.patch

And the manpages I've added
http://jpoker.aminche.com/jscoverage-debian/debian/jscoverage.1
http://jpoker.aminche.com/jscoverage-debian/debian/jslint.1
http://jpoker.aminche.com/jscoverage-debian/debian/jspack.1

Thanks for reminding me about this.

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Loic Dachary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  I've uploaded the jscoverage package you did to debian. There still are
>  a few warnings and here are
>  the comments that suggest how you can fix them. Did you inform the
>  jscoverage authors about your
>  work ?
>
>  Cheers
>
>
>  Uploading (ftp) to ftp-master.debian.org:/pub/UploadQueue
>  [ job jscoverage_0.3.1-1_i386 from jscoverage_0.3.1-1_i386.changes
>   jscoverage_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz, md5sum ok
>   jscoverage_0.3.1-1.dsc, md5sum ok
>   jscoverage_0.3.1-1_i386.deb, md5sum ok
>   jscoverage_0.3.1-1.diff.gz, md5sum ok
>   jscoverage_0.3.1-1_i386.changes ok ]
>  N: Setting up lab in /tmp/eSxk7HCSFj ...
>  N: Processing 1 packages...
>  N: ----
>  N: Processing binary package jscoverage (version 0.3.1-1) ...
>  W: jscoverage: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry
>  usr/share/man/man1/js-config.1.gz
>  N:
>  N:   Each manual page should start with a `NAME' section, which lists the
>  N:   name and a brief description of the page seperated by '\-'. These
>  N:   sections are parsed by `mandb' and stored in a database for the use of
>  N:   `apropos' and `whatis', so they must be in a certain format. This
>  N:   manual page apparently uses the wrong format and cannot be parsed by
>  N:   `mandb'.
>  N:
>  N:   For information on how `NAME' sections should be written see
>  N:   lexgrog(1). See also groff_man(7) and groff_mdoc(7) for general
>  N:   information on writing manual pages.
>  N:
>  W: jscoverage: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man1/js.1.gz
>  W: jscoverage: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man3/js.3.gz
>  W: jscoverage: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libjs.so.1.0.6
>  usr/lib/libjs.so
>  N:
>  N:   Although this package is not a `-dev' package, it installs a
>  N:   `libsomething.so' symbolic link referencing the corresponding shared
>  N:   library. When the link doesn't include the version number, it is used
>  N:   by the linker when other programs are built against this shared
>  N:   library.
>  N:
>  N:   Shared libraries are supposed to place such symbolic links in their
>  N:   respective `-dev' packages, so it is a bug to include it with the main
>  N:   library package.
>  N:
>  N:   However, if this is a small package which includes the runtime and the
>  N:   development libraries, this is not a bug. In the latter case, please
>  N:   override this warning.
>  N:
>  N:   Refer to Policy Manual, section 8.4 for details.
>  N:
>  W: jscoverage: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libjs1
>  N:
>  N:   The package name of a library package should usually reflect the
>  N:   soname of the included library. The package name can determined from
>  N:   the library file name with the following code snippet:
>  N:
>  N:    $ objdump -p /path/to/libfoo-bar.so.1.2.3 | sed -n
>  -e's/^[[:space:]]*SONAME[[:space:]]*//p' | sed
>  -e's/\([0-9]\)\.so\./\1-/; s/\.so\.//'
>  N:
>  N:   Refer to Library Packaging guide 5 for details.
>  N:
>



-- 
bou ^

_______________________________________________
Pokersource-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pokersource-users

Reply via email to